Cryptographically Enforced Fairness Protocols for Algorithmic Trading on Distributed Ledger Infrastructures
Keywords:
cryptographic fairness, algorithmic trading, distributed ledger, verifiable delay functions, transaction ordering, latency-neutral execution, settlement transparency, high-frequency tradingAbstract
Distributed ledger platform cryptographically enforced algorithmic trading fairness techniques are scrutinized. Over decentralized trading systems, researchers examine bias-free, latency-neutral, transparent transaction ordering algorithms. Every market party has equal access because VDFs and DLPs prevent hostile actors from altering transaction sequencing. Theory and practice of cryptographic fairness benefit settlement finality, throughput scalability, and network consensus efficiency. A thorough examination shows that these solutions improve auditability, regulatory compliance, algorithmic trading ecosystem trust, and transaction sequencing. Cryptographically fair high-frequency, decentralized trading systems use DLT, cryptographic primitives, and algorithmic market operations.
Downloads
References
D. Boneh, J. Bonneau, B. Bünz and B. Fisch, “Verifiable Delay Functions,” Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2018/601, 2018.
K. Pietrzak, “Simple Verifiable Delay Functions,” Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2018/627, 2018.
T. G. Tan, V. Sharma, Z. Li, P. Szalachowski and J. Zhou, “ZKBdf: A ZKBoo-based Quantum-Secure Verifiable Delay Function with Prover-secret,” Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2022/1373, 2022.
C. Hoffmann and K. Pietrzak, “Watermarkable and Zero-Knowledge Verifiable Delay Functions from any Proof of Exponentiation,” Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2024/481, 2024.
A. Biryukov, B. Fisch, G. Herold, D. Khovratovich, G. Leurent, M. Naya-Plasencia and B. Wesolowski, “Cryptanalysis of Algebraic Verifiable Delay Functions,” Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2024/873, 2024.
Y. Ren, Q. Wu, L. Xi, S. Wang and S. Ji, “Verifiable Delay Function and Its Blockchain-Related Application: A Survey,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 19, p. 7524, 2022.
A. Orda and O. Rottenstreich, “Enforcing Fairness in Blockchain Transaction Ordering,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC), 2019.
Y. Sokolik, M. Nassar and O. Rottenstreich, “Age-Aware Fairness in Blockchain Transaction Ordering for Reducing Tail Latency,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2025.
M. Kelkar, “Order-Fair Consensus in the Permissionless Setting,” ACM, 2022.
Z. Li and E. Pournaras, “SoK: Consensus for Fair Message Ordering,” arXiv, Nov. 2024.
S. Cohen, N. Basu, S. Basu and L. Alvisi, “On Fair Ordering and Differential Privacy,” arXiv, Jan. 2025.
E. Mahe and S. Tucci-Piergiovanni, “Order Fairness Evaluation of DAG-based Ledgers,” arXiv, Feb. 2025.
L. Zhou et al., “Leveraging Zero Knowledge Proofs for Blockchain-Based Systems: Survey and Future Directions,” ScienceDirect, 2024.
S. R. Shashidhara, R. Nair and P. P. Panakalapati, “Promise of Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) for Blockchain Privacy and Security,” Security and Privacy, vol. 8, no. 1, 2024.
A. Micali, “Verifiable Random Functions,” Communications of the ACM, foundational work on VRFs, 1999.
M. Barczentewicz, “Blockchain Transaction Ordering as Market Mechanism,” SSRN, 2023.
A. Asayag, G. Cohen, I. Grayevsky and D. Yakira, “A Fair Consensus Protocol for Transaction Ordering,” IEEE, 2018.
Y. Luo, D. Guo, R. T. B. Ma and X. Luo, “Optimizing Bloom Filter Techniques to Control Access in Distributed Systems,” IEEE, 2018.
X. Xue and S. Kannan, “Travelers: A Scalable Fair Ordering BFT System,” arXiv, Jan. 2024.
Y. Alt, “Distributed Ledger Technology: Adoption, Benefits and Challenges,” Electronic Markets, 2025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
